Let’s look at two 5 MW solar plants in Rajasthan, sitting just 10 km apart. Both connected to the same substation. Both commissioned in 2020.
Plant A is owned by "Passive Power Pvt Ltd." Plant B is owned by "Smart Energy Assets."
In April, the State Load Despatch Centre (SLDC) issued a "Backing Down" instruction. They ordered all solar plants in the cluster to reduce generation by 50% for 4 hours during peak afternoon sun.
The Passive Approach (Plant A)
The O&M manager at Plant A saw the order and dialled down the inverters.
- The Logbook Entry: "Grid Unavailability / Curtailment."
- The Result: Plant A lost 10,000 units (kWh) of generation that day.
- The Financial Hit: The owner wrote it off as "Force Majeure." He believed that because the government ordered it, he couldn't do anything about it.
Total Loss: ₹40,000 in one day.
The Active Approach (Plant B)
The O&M team at Plant B also dialled down the inverters to comply (you must obey the SLDC). But they did something else.
They pulled the Grid Frequency Data from their SCADA system for those specific 4 hours.
- The Discovery: The grid frequency was normal (50.00 Hz). There was no emergency.
- The Real Reason: The DISCOM was simply backing down solar to buy cheaper power from elsewhere or manage their own mismanagement.
The Action: Plant B’s owner used this data to file a claim under the "Must Run" status protections. Since the curtailment wasn't for "Grid Security," it was deemed a commercial curtailment.
The Result: Under recent APTEL judgments and the Electricity Rules 2021, Plant B was eligible for compensation for their "Deemed Generation."
The Moral of the Story
Grid curtailment is a reality in India. But not all curtailment is legal.
If you don't have an O&M partner who tracks Backing Down Instructions against Real-Time Grid Data, you are likely throwing away lakhs of rupees every year.
Don't be Plant A. Let’s track your curtailment properly.